How much ORFY does a selected tier require in each staking pool?

The ORFY amount corresponding to a target tier equals its staking-point threshold divided by the chosen pool’s tier staking multiplier. The threshold therefore represents a point requirement, not a universal token amount. This calculation identifies the stake for that tier in the published model; the selected IDO may require a different minimum tier. It does not calculate the separate payment for project tokens.

Does the published APR describe the return for the entire lock period?

APR expresses an annual percentage rate, so the quoted figure is not automatically the percentage earned during a shorter lock period. The five-pool schedule attaches a quoted APR to each lock duration. Calculating a payout also requires the pool’s accrual and withdrawal rules. The published schedule alone does not establish a compounding frequency or a currently payable reward.

Is a 50x Satoshi weight the same as 50% of an IDO?

A 50x Satoshi weight represents 50 times the base allocation in the published model. A percentage share also requires the total weighted participant count. Each additional participant contributes the weight of their tier to that total. The Satoshi label therefore cannot determine a fixed percentage on its own; the sale’s participant mix supplies the denominator.

Can a pool weight tell me the cash amount that I may invest?

A pool weight expresses a relative allocation factor, so it cannot determine a cash limit without that sale’s allocation and pricing terms. The token-allocation formula first produces an amount of sale tokens. Converting that token quantity into a payment requires the IDO price and its payment currency. Staked ORFY supports tier access; the separate IDO contribution purchases project tokens.

Are IDO token discounts part of the six-tier allocation formula?

The six-tier allocation formula calculates token quantities and does not assign price discounts. A higher weight increases a participant’s allocation at a given base amount. Any price advantage would depend on an additional sale-specific pricing term. The listed Intern-to-Satoshi weights alone do not establish a discount, so the tier factor cannot determine how much each project token costs.

Ordifyworld

Ordifyworld IDO tiers link ORFY staking points to allocation weights in the documented launchpad model

13 October 2026 - updated

Ordifyworld IDO tiers determine relative token-sale allocations from ORFY staking points in the documented launchpad model. Six levels run from Intern to Satoshi, with entry thresholds expressed in staking points. In an initial decentralized exchange offering (IDO), a qualifying tier supplies a weight for calculating the purchase limit. A longer lockup increases points for an unchanged stake. It increases the allocation weight when those points qualify for a higher tier. The sale combines that weight with the participant mix and available token pool to determine an individual limit. Account verification and the sale’s minimum tier also govern eligibility. Choosing a lock period involves a time commitment, a threshold decision and separate staking reward terms.

Does a longer ORFY lockup always increase my IDO allocation?

A longer ORFY lockup raises staking points for an unchanged stake; the allocation weight increases when those points reach a higher tier. The published structure assigns one pool weight to each tier. Points that remain inside the same tier retain that listed weight. This makes the distance to the next threshold relevant when comparing lock periods.

The six tiers and their entry thresholds

Six tiers define the published allocation ladder, beginning at 200 staking points and ending at the Satoshi threshold of 50 000 points. Each tier pairs an entry requirement with its own pool weight. The point thresholds and weights increase in different increments.

Intern requires 200 staking points and carries a 1x pool weight.
Engineer requires 1 000 staking points and carries a 2x pool weight.
Pilot requires 5 000 staking points and carries a 6x pool weight.
Specialist requires 10 000 staking points and carries a 10x pool weight.
Astronaut requires 20 000 staking points and carries a 20x pool weight.
Satoshi requires 50 000 staking points and carries a 50x pool weight.

The threshold expresses staking points, which can differ from the number of ORFY tokens committed. The chosen lockup multiplier explains that difference. A tier’s position on the ladder also does not settle eligibility for every sale. An individual IDO can set a higher minimum tier than the lowest published level.

Two multipliers with different jobs

Two factors enter different parts of the calculation: the tier staking multiplier determines points, and the tier pool weight determines an allocation relative to the base amount. The staking multiplier belongs to the selected lock period. The pool weight belongs to the tier that the resulting points qualify for.

For an ORFY stake, tier staking points equal the number of tokens staked multiplied by the selected pool’s tier staking multiplier.

Staking points measure qualification within the tier system. They do not represent the cash value of the stake or tokens purchased in a fundraising event. The ORFY amount and the points balance therefore need separate units when comparing requirements.

Once the tier determines the pool weight, the sale applies that weight to its base allocation. The base amount varies with the sale pool and participating tiers. Different launches can assign different token amounts to the same tier, even when its weight remains unchanged.

A 2x staking multiplier doubles the points assigned to an unchanged ORFY stake in this model. It does not automatically double the tier’s pool weight. The threshold that those points reach determines which listed allocation factor applies.

Five lock periods in the published staking schedule

Five lock periods appear in the staking schedule published on December 29, 2023, ranging from 30 to 360 days. Each combines a points multiplier with a quoted annual percentage rate (APR). The schedule supplies historical settings; current pool availability and live rates remain unconfirmed.

December 2023 ORFY staking parameters
Tier staking multiplier	Extra points versus 1x	Published APR	Lock period
1x	No extra points	1%	30 days
1.2x	20% more	3%	60 days
1.4x	40% more	5%	90 days
1.6x	60% more	8%	180 days
2x	100% more	12%	360 days

The extra-points column compares each multiplier with the 1x option at an unchanged stake. It measures tier points, not an additional percentage return on ORFY. The APR belongs to staking rewards. The tier that the calculated points reach sets the allocation weight separately.

Staking rewards and time commitment

Staking rewards attach to the locked ORFY balance, while IDO allocations define participation in a project’s token sale. The published reward schedule ties higher APRs to longer lock periods. Receiving a particular APR does not establish an equivalent percentage share of an IDO. The two benefits use different calculations.

Longer lockups change the period that the stake remains committed. The December 2023 participation article specified a 7% penalty for unstaking before maturity. It also stated a 14-day minimum staking period, but did not explain how that minimum affected early withdrawal. Increasing the ORFY amount and increasing the lockup multiplier therefore change different commitments. The first puts more tokens into the stake; the second ties the selected stake to a longer term. The tier threshold alone does not express either cost.

How does the participant mix change an allocation?

More eligible participants enlarge the weighted allocation denominator, reducing each base allocation when the number of tokens on sale stays unchanged. Each participant contributes the pool weight of their tier to that denominator. The calculation counts participants at every tier, so a simple account count cannot determine the base allocation.

The token-allocation formula divides the sale’s token pool by the sum of all participant weights. Multiplying that base allocation by an individual’s tier weight gives the individual’s allocation in sale tokens. Participant counts therefore affect the value of every base slot. Members of the same tier use the same weight in this calculation.

A higher weight establishes a larger relative allocation under the same sale conditions. The absolute token amount can still differ between events because their token pools and participant mixes differ.

Minimum tier and account eligibility

Account verification and the sale’s minimum staking tier remain mandatory eligibility conditions in the documented model, regardless of the pool weight reached. The model uses Blockpass for its know-your-customer (KYC) check. A sale may also require interest registration for its guaranteed round. The minimum qualifying tier can vary between IDOs, so the six-level schedule does not establish universal Intern access. Country-based participation restrictions can prevent entry even when an account has enough staking points.

Snapshot timing and stake changes

The pre-sale snapshot records the tier information used for individual allocations, alongside the participant mix and the event’s fundraising amount. The December 29, 2023 participation model placed that snapshot 24 hours before a project launch. Under that model, participants needed to have their qualifying ORFY stake in place by the snapshot.

A tier calculated from a later stake balance does not by itself establish a revised allocation for that event. Any adjustment after the snapshot would require an event-specific update rule. The historical schedule does not settle how a live sale handles changes near its cutoff. A published tier threshold can explain qualification without establishing a current sale deadline.

What does the guaranteed round reserve?

The documented guaranteed round gives eligible participants a 24-hour investment window, with each participant’s snapshot allocation setting the maximum purchase. A tier weight defines the relative calculation behind that cap. It does not require the participant to purchase the whole amount.

A purchase also follows the pool’s claim and vesting terms. Those terms govern token availability after the sale, beyond the tier formula. Allocation determines the purchase limit; the project’s release schedule determines when purchased tokens become claimable.

FCFS capacity and conditional multipliers

A one-hour first-come-first-served (FCFS) round follows the guaranteed round only when tokens remain unsold in the published fundraising process. This stage usually expands individual allocation limits by 3x to 5x. The applicable factor belongs to that event, and remaining supply governs whether an eligible participant can purchase. The larger limit does not reserve that enlarged quantity for every account.

Accounts that miss required interest registration can remain eligible for FCFS when they satisfy KYC and the minimum staking tier. This exception concerns registration alone. An account missing either mandatory condition does not gain eligibility from the FCFS stage. The expanded cap concerns the fundraising round; it does not change the ORFY stake’s multiplier or create a new tier.

The earlier referral-point model

The pre-token launch model described referral points as a route to tier access for Ordifyworld’s own token sale. It also contemplated allocations for other launches that might precede ORFY’s token launch. That route addressed a stage in which participants did not yet have the platform token to stake.

View image file

The staking model calculates points from committed ORFY and a lockup multiplier. Referral points and tier staking points share a label, but they arise from different qualifying activities. The published staking formula contains no referral-point conversion. Combining their balances would require a separate rule that expressly permits conversion or addition. A historical referral tier does not by itself establish a present staking tier or an allocation in a later sale.

Ordifyworld IDO tiers: reader questions

How much ORFY does a selected tier require in each staking pool?: The ORFY amount corresponding to a target tier equals its staking-point threshold divided by the chosen pool’s tier staking multiplier. The threshold therefore represents a point requirement, not a universal token amount. This calculation identifies the stake for that tier in the published model; the selected IDO may require a different minimum tier. It does not calculate the separate payment for project tokens.
Does the published APR describe the return for the entire lock period?: APR expresses an annual percentage rate, so the quoted figure is not automatically the percentage earned during a shorter lock period. The five-pool schedule attaches a quoted APR to each lock duration. Calculating a payout also requires the pool’s accrual and withdrawal rules. The published schedule alone does not establish a compounding frequency or a currently payable reward.
Is a 50x Satoshi weight the same as 50% of an IDO?: A 50x Satoshi weight represents 50 times the base allocation in the published model. A percentage share also requires the total weighted participant count. Each additional participant contributes the weight of their tier to that total. The Satoshi label therefore cannot determine a fixed percentage on its own; the sale’s participant mix supplies the denominator.
Can a pool weight tell me the cash amount that I may invest?: A pool weight expresses a relative allocation factor, so it cannot determine a cash limit without that sale’s allocation and pricing terms. The token-allocation formula first produces an amount of sale tokens. Converting that token quantity into a payment requires the IDO price and its payment currency. Staked ORFY supports tier access; the separate IDO contribution purchases project tokens.
Are IDO token discounts part of the six-tier allocation formula?: The six-tier allocation formula calculates token quantities and does not assign price discounts. A higher weight increases a participant’s allocation at a given base amount. Any price advantage would depend on an additional sale-specific pricing term. The listed Intern-to-Satoshi weights alone do not establish a discount, so the tier factor cannot determine how much each project token costs.